James R. Endress v. Richard L. Dugger, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that although the district court's subsidiary factual findings are presumed to be correct, an appellate court independently considers whether the findings support a conclusion that the suspect was interrogated
• defendant volunteered information without questioning
• defendant volunteered information without questioning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).