· 10/1/2003
James R. Bankston v. Thomas E. White, Secretary of the Army United States of America
Citations
- 345 F.3d 768
- 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8800
- 2003 Daily Journal DAR 11103
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20065
- 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,497
- 92 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1156
- 2003 WL 22244775
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that McAdams relied on Title VII’s exhaustion requirement and did not require the plaintiff to exhaust his administrative remedies for his ADEA claim
- remanding lower court decision requiring administrative exhaustion where plaintiffs EEOC complaint was dismissed, pursuant to a regulation, when he filed suit in civil court
- specifically denying the argument 22 that the employee needs to wait for final agency action
- “an employee who wishes to file suit without pursuing administrative remedies 15 must give the EEOC notice of intent to sue at least 30 days before filing suit.”
- an employee who wishes to file suit under the ADEA without pursuing administrative remedies must give the EEOC notice of intent to sue at least 30 days before filing suit
- ADEA has no express exhaustion requirement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hug, Gibson, Fisher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.