Skip to main content
· 10/1/2003

James R. Bankston v. Thomas E. White, Secretary of the Army United States of America

Citations

  • 345 F.3d 768
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8800
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 11103
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20065
  • 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,497
  • 92 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1156
  • 2003 WL 22244775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that McAdams relied on Title VII’s exhaustion requirement and did not require the plaintiff to exhaust his administrative remedies for his ADEA claim
  • remanding lower court decision requiring administrative exhaustion where plaintiffs EEOC complaint was dismissed, pursuant to a regulation, when he filed suit in civil court
  • specifically denying the argument 22 that the employee needs to wait for final agency action
  • “an employee who wishes to file suit without pursuing administrative remedies 15 must give the EEOC notice of intent to sue at least 30 days before filing suit.”
  • an employee who wishes to file suit under the ADEA without pursuing administrative remedies must give the EEOC notice of intent to sue at least 30 days before filing suit
  • ADEA has no express exhaustion requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Gibson, Fisher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.