Skip to main content
· 3/5/1998

James Perkins v. U S West Communications

Citations

  • 138 F.3d 336
  • 40 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 53
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 3734
  • 72 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,233
  • 76 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Rule 68 leaves no discretion in the district court to do anything other than enter judgment once an offer of judgment has been accepted.”
  • “Rule 68 leaves no discretion in the district court to do anything other than enter judgment once an offer of judgment has been accepted.”
  • “Rule 68 leaves no discretion in the district court to do anything other than enter judgment once an offer of judgment has been accepted.”
  • “We conclude that the plain language of Rule 68 mandates that an offer of judgment remain valid and open for acceptance for the full ten-day period outlined in the Rule despite an intervening grant of summary judgment by the district court.”
  • standard of review for Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion
  • stating standard of review is de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Bright, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.