James P. Cotton, Jr. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding insurer’s allocation of premium payments, analysis of policy performance, and communications with participants constituted “ministerial policy-related services” that did not “render [the insurer] a fiduciary”
• stating that “a defaulted defendant is deemed to admit the plaintiff's well-pleaded allegations of fact.”
• stating that “a defaulted defendant is deemed to admit the plaintiff’s well-pleaded allegations of fact.”
• holding insurer’s allocation of premium payments, analysis of policy performance, and communications with participants constituted “ministerial policy-related services” that did not “render [the insurer] a fiduciary”
• stating that a defaulted defendant is deemed to admit the plaintiff’s well-pleaded factual allegations
• recognizing that court had previously made this error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).