James MOSCHETTI, Appellant, v. CHICAGO, CENTRAL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining this burden-shifting analysis, citing Rothmeier v. Investment Advisers, Inc., 85 F.3d 1328, 1332 (8th Cir. 1996)
• prima facie case for actionable hostile work environment the same under both ICRA and Title VII
• prima facie case for actionable hostile work environment the same under both ICRA and Title VII
• analysis of retaliation claims is the same under Title VII and ICRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).