Skip to main content
· 10/18/1971

James Michael McCONNELL, Appellee, v. Elmer ANDERSON Et Al., Appellants

Citations

  • 451 F.2d 193
  • 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7561
  • 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7543
  • 3 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the crucial question in determining whether improper service merits the quashing of a subpoena is whether the party alleging insufficient service of process “received notice sufficient to afford it the opportunity to appear and to be heard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mehaffy, Ross, Stephenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.