· 10/18/1971
James Michael McCONNELL, Appellee, v. Elmer ANDERSON Et Al., Appellants
Citations
- 451 F.2d 193
- 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7561
- 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7543
- 3 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining the crucial question in determining whether improper service merits the quashing of a subpoena is whether the party alleging insufficient service of process “received notice sufficient to afford it the opportunity to appear and to be heard”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mehaffy, Ross, Stephenson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.