Skip to main content
· 12/9/1954

James Matthews v. United States

Citations

  • 217 F.2d 409
  • 50 A.L.R. 2d 1187
  • 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • statutorily required “sugar reports” to detect sales of substances used in the manufacture of distilled spirits were inadmissible as lacking necessary trustworthiness and because they were not used as an integral part of the business in its own interest.
  • right of confrontation policies and the sixth amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hutcheson, Rives, Tuttle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.