James MATHEWSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL AUTOMATIC TOOL CO., INC., Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[E]vidence of earlier discriminatory conduct by an employer that is time-barred is nevertheless entirely appropriate evidence to help prove a timely claim based on subsequent discriminatory conduct by the employer.\
• time-barred evidence may be used to prove a timely claim based on subsequent discriminatory conduct by an employer
• \[E]vidence of earlier discriminatory conduct by an employer that is time-barred is nevertheless entirely appropriate evidence to help prove a timely claim based on subsequent discriminatory conduct by the employer.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).