James M. Marx v. Kelly, Hart & Hallman, P.C., D/B/A Kelly, Appleman, Hart and Hallman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reciting that a Rule 37 dismissal is reviewed for abuse of discretion
• reciting that a Rule 37 dismissal is reviewed for abuse of discretion
• sitting in diversity, Court of Appeals relies on Massachusetts law to decide agency issue in case brought in district court in Massachusetts
• “[T]he assertion of privilege . . . must also be accompanied by sufficient information to allow the court to rule intelligently on the privilege claim.”
• \The choice of sanctions for failing to comply with an order of the district court lies within the sound discretion of the court.\
• “If the responding party fails to make a timely objection, or fails to state the reason for an objection, he may be held to have waived any or all of his objections.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).