Skip to main content
· 7/5/1989

James M. King & Associates, Inc. v. G.D. Van Wagenen Co.

Citations

  • 717 F. Supp. 667
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7520
  • 1989 WL 73490

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining the privilege as existing only when the parent acts to protect the subsidiary's economic interests
  • defining the privilege as existing only when the parent acts to protect the subsidiary’s economic interests
  • \[T]here is general agreement that a corporate shareholder. . . would have a sufficient economic interest in a subsidiary corporation to interfere in some of the subsidiary's business relationships.\
  • “[T]here is general agreement that a corporate shareholder ... would have a sufficient economic interest in a subsidiary corporation to interfere in some of the subsidiary’s business relationships.”
  • “[A] parent is privileged to, or justified in, interfering with the contracts of its wholly-owned subsidiary provided it does not use wrongful means and acts to protect its economic interests.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.