Skip to main content
· 3/10/1988

James Lee Percy v. San Francisco General Hospital City and County of San Francisco

Citations

  • 841 F.2d 975
  • 10 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 535
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3036
  • 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,878
  • 46 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 566
  • 1988 WL 19281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining fairness requires “the defendant be able to anticipate claims that might follow from- the facts alleged by the plaintiff’
  • appellate court reviews de novo whether the relation-back doctrine of Rule 15(c
  • appellate court reviews de novo whether the relation-back doctrine of Rule 15(c
  • appellate court reviews de novo whether the relation-back doctrine of Rule 15(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Noonan, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.