· 3/10/1988
James Lee Percy v. San Francisco General Hospital City and County of San Francisco
Citations
- 841 F.2d 975
- 10 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 535
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3036
- 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,878
- 46 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 566
- 1988 WL 19281
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining fairness requires “the defendant be able to anticipate claims that might follow from- the facts alleged by the plaintiff’
- appellate court reviews de novo whether the relation-back doctrine of Rule 15(c
- appellate court reviews de novo whether the relation-back doctrine of Rule 15(c
- appellate court reviews de novo whether the relation-back doctrine of Rule 15(c
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Noonan, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.