James Lee Lampkins v. John R. Gagnon, Warden, and Bronson C. Lafollette, Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exhaustion in Wisconsin state court was not required where recent decisions of the Wisconsin Supreme Court made it clear that pursuit of the prisoner’s claims would have been futile
• holding that exhaustion in Wisconsin state court was not re- quired where recent decisions of the Wisconsin Supreme Court made it clear that pursuit of the prisoner’s claims would have been futile
• “We find no constitutional infringement in Wisconsin’s decision to make participation in a crime a criminal act.”
• ‘We find no constitutional infringement in Wisconsin’s decision to make participation in a crime a criminal act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).