Skip to main content
· 2/27/1989

James L. Rose and Judy S. Rose v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Citations

  • 868 F.2d 851
  • 63 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 776
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2199
  • 1989 WL 14907

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • following Rice's Toyota World, Inc. v. Commissioner , 752 F.2d 89 , 96 (4th Cir. 1985) , revg. in part 81 T.C. 184 (1983)
  • declining to adopt the “generic tax shelter” analysis “because it does not aid [the Court] in the basic inquiry as to whether the transaction has any practicable economic effects other than the creation of income tax losses,” which is “the proper standard”
  • \The requirement of a profit objective is not one of the limitations in section 163 on the deduction of interest actually paid.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Martin, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.