Skip to main content
· 4/10/1998

James L. Redlark Cheryl L. Redlark v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Citations

  • 141 F.3d 936
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2647
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 3669
  • 81 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1483
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7150
  • 1998 WL 164767

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing as “untenable” the “assertion that the words, ‘properly allocable’, unambiguously specify that interest on business-related personal income tax deficiencies should be deductible”
  • agreeing with the statement of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (Miller) “that personal income tax obligations are always essentially personal in nature”
  • agreeing with the statement of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (Miller) \that personal income tax obligations are always essentially personal in nature\
  • finding untenable taxpayers’ assertion that the words “properly* allocable” unambiguously specify that interest on business-related personal income tax deficiencies should be deductible
  • describing as “untenable” the “assertion that the words, ‘properly allocable’, unambiguously specify that interest on business-related personal income tax deficiencies should be deductible”
  • agreeing with the statement of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (Miller) - 22 - “that personal income tax obligations are always essentially personal in nature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boochever, Fletcher, Reinhardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.