· 5/20/2021
James Kendall Crotwell and Terry Crotwell v. T & W Homes Etc, LLC
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the juvenile court “has authority to direct the youth to remain in the legal custody of the youth’s parents” and “to determine whether OYA custody is in the youth’s best interests”
- recognizing that the juvenile court “has authority to direct the youth to remain in the legal custody of the youth’s parents” and “to determine whether OYA custody is in the youth’s best interests”
- reasoning that juvenile courts should base their decisions on “the specific circumstances and rehabilitative needs of the youth in each case”
- reasoning that juvenile courts should base their decisions on “the specific circumstances and rehabilitative needs of the youth in each case”
- discussing the juvenile court’s “discretionary authority to determine the appropri- ate disposition based on the specific circumstances and reha- bilitative needs of the youth in each case”
- discussing juvenile court’s “discretionary authority to determine the appropriate disposition based upon the specific circumstances and rehabilitative needs of the youth in each case”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kitchens, James W., P.J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.