James Kanagu v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court lacked jurisdiction to consider a proposed social group where the petitioner had urged a broader formulation of the group to the Board of Immigration Appeals
• “Insofar as Kanagu attempts to further narrow his group on appeal, we lack jurisdiction to consider arguments not clearly made before the agency.”
• “Insofar as Kanagu attempts to further narrow his group on appeal, we lack jurisdiction to consider arguments not clearly made before the agency.”
• “Insofar as [the petitioner] attempts to further narrow his group on appeal, we lack jurisdiction to consider arguments not clearly made before the agency.”
• “[W]e lack jurisdiction to consider arguments not clearly made before the agency.”
• “[W]e lack jurisdiction to consider arguments not clearly made before the [BIA].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).