James Joseph Darnell v. Vincent Swinney Attorney General of the State of Nevada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no Bouie violation where defendant “clearly had fair warning that his contemplated conduct — attempting to possess stolen property — was criminal”
• holding that there was no Bouie violation where defendant “clearly had fair warning that his contemplated conduct — attempting to possess stolen property — was criminal”
• holding that there was no Bouie violation where defendant “clearly had fair warning that his contemplated conduct — attempting to possess stolen property — was criminal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).