Skip to main content
· 2/11/1965

James J. Laughlin v. United States of America, Alan U. Forte v. United States

Citations

  • 344 F.2d 187
  • 120 U.S. App. D.C. 93
  • 21 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 869
  • 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6590

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collateral estoppel applied to introduction of tape recordings previously found to have been made in violation of statute.
  • ultimate facts are those which the law makes the occasion for imposing its sanctions
  • collateral-estoppel effect accorded the suppression of tape recordings in earlier prosecution
  • collateral-estoppel effect accorded the suppression of tape recordings in earlier prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edgerton, Danaher, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.