· 2/11/1965
James J. Laughlin v. United States of America, Alan U. Forte v. United States
Citations
- 344 F.2d 187
- 120 U.S. App. D.C. 93
- 21 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 869
- 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6590
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- collateral estoppel applied to introduction of tape recordings previously found to have been made in violation of statute.
- ultimate facts are those which the law makes the occasion for imposing its sanctions
- collateral-estoppel effect accorded the suppression of tape recordings in earlier prosecution
- collateral-estoppel effect accorded the suppression of tape recordings in earlier prosecution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edgerton, Danaher, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.