James J. Collins, Jr. v. Judith Harrison-Bode, Monet Group, Inc., Monet Group Holdings, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a settlement agreement is ambiguous and remanding for “the district court to provide the parties an opportunity to present extrinsic evidence”
• vacating “the district court’s judgment . . . based on its determination that the [s]ettlement [a]greement [wa]s unambiguous” and remanding “the case to the district court to provide the parties an opportunity to present extrinsic evidence” as to the ambiguous portion of the agreement”
• “[W]Jhere . □ □ there are internal inconsistencies in a contract pointing to ambiguity, extrinsic evidence is admissible to determine the parties’ intent.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).