James Hill v. Madison County School Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a teacher’s aide was not an “appropriate person” for purposes of Title IX
• explaining that officials are not entitled to state-agent immunity under Alabama law if they acted willfully, maliciously, or in bad faith
• holding teacher’s aide was not an “appropriate person” when no evidence in the record suggested she had “the authority to discipline students for sexual harassment”
• “Title IX is enforceable against institutions and programs that receive federal funds, but does not authorize suits against individuals.”
• “The standard for student-on-student sexual harassment claims is far more rigorous than a claim for teacher-on-student harassment.”
• “A clearly unreasonable response causes students to undergo harassment or makes them more vulnerable to it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).