· 6/26/1992
James Hildebrand v. Commissioner Internal Revenue Service
Citations
- 967 F.2d 350
- 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5593
- 92 Daily Journal DAR 8918
- 70 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5134
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 14529
- 1992 WL 142058
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding section 6621(c)(1) penalty where sham transaction lacked economic substance and was designed for tax benefits
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boochever, Beezer, Trott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.