James Heiko v. Colombo Savings Bank, F.S.B., Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Supporting

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of possible pretext because plaintiff’s qualifications were “demonstratively superior”
• noting that “the denial of a single promotional opportunity is insufficient to create an intolerable working environment” (citation omitted)
• finding that a reasonable fact finder • could conclude the plaintiff was posed for a specific position and displayed the applicable aptitude needed for that position
• “Whether an employment environment is intolerable is determined from the objective perspective of a reasonable person.”
• “[W]e assess relative job qualifications based on the criteria that the employer has established as relevant to the position in question.”
• “[W]e assess relative job qualifications based on the criteria that the employer has established as relevant to the position in question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).