James Heekin Co. v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that neither the proponent nor the court “found[] any case in which a non-party has been permitted to invoke Rule 26(b)(4)(D)”
• noting that the objecting non-party had not cited, “and the court has not found, any case in which a non-party has been permitted to invoke Rule 26(b)(4)(D) in a case where it is not a party”
• once the requesting party has demonstrated that the information is protected, the burden falls on the opposing party to demonstrate exceptional circumstances compelling disclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).