JAMES HARVEY, — v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, —

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it is reasonable for an ALJ to discount a claimant’s subjective complaints of disabling pain when the pain is controllable by medication
• stating “the opinion of a non-examining consulting physician” is “not ‘considered substantial evidence in the face of the conflicting assessment of a treating physician.’”
• noting that ALJ may consider opinion of non-examining, consulting physician
• allowing ALJ reliance on a “non-examining consulting physician” because the ALJ did not rely “solely” on the report and viewed the opinion as “one part of the record”
• allowing ALJ reliance on a “non-examining consulting physician” because the ALJ did not rely “solely” on the report and viewed the opinion as “one part of the record”
• allowing ALJ reliance on a “non-examining consulting physician” because the ALJ did not rely “solely” on the report and viewed the opinion as “one part of the record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).