James H. Sanders v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government’s liability for monetary damages in the event of breach “should not be implied”
• holding that the Court of Federal Claims has no jurisdiction to hear cases of criminal liability
• recognizing that “a damages remedy is not ordinarily available” where the alleged agreement “is entirely concerned with the conduct of the parties in a criminal case”
• holding that criminal plea agreement was not within this Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction
• holding that criminal plea agreement was not within this Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction
• noting that the court-approved stipulated order at issue could be fairly characterized as an “ ‘express or implied in fact’ contract,” yet finding no jurisdiction in the USCFC

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).