Skip to main content
· 4/28/1986

James H. POWELL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 788 F.2d 279
  • 20 Fed. R. Serv. 631
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 24688
  • 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,178
  • 40 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1061

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that company officials’ threats that the plaintiff would be “dealt with,” among other evidence allows for the inference of possible pretext
  • holding that plaintiff bears burden of production as well as persuasion
  • stating that under the facts of the case, \the jury finding of retaliatory discharge necessarily found 'willfulness' as defined by Thurston \
  • holding that plaintiff bears burden of production as well as persuasion
  • affirming jury finding of willfulness in a case in which jury found that plaintiff was fired in retaliation for exercising his ADEA rights
  • finding sufficient evidence of pretext when, among other things, “officials made specific threats against [the employee] for” engaging in protected activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randall, Williams, Hinojosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.