· 4/28/1986
James H. POWELL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
Citations
- 788 F.2d 279
- 20 Fed. R. Serv. 631
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 24688
- 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,178
- 40 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1061
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that company officials’ threats that the plaintiff would be “dealt with,” among other evidence allows for the inference of possible pretext
- holding that plaintiff bears burden of production as well as persuasion
- stating that under the facts of the case, \the jury finding of retaliatory discharge necessarily found 'willfulness' as defined by Thurston \
- holding that plaintiff bears burden of production as well as persuasion
- affirming jury finding of willfulness in a case in which jury found that plaintiff was fired in retaliation for exercising his ADEA rights
- finding sufficient evidence of pretext when, among other things, “officials made specific threats against [the employee] for” engaging in protected activity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Randall, Williams, Hinojosa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.