Skip to main content
· 2/2/2024

James H. Brockman v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • agreeing with the district court that a conversion to summary judgment “is clearly impermissible under these circumstances” because there were “essential disputes as to the material facts in the case”
  • vacated and remanded on other grounds by Weinberger v. Ramirez de Arellano, 471 U.S. 1113 (1985)
  • describing the act of state doctrine as a “prudential balance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.