James G.P. Collins v. Associated Pathologists, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that plaintiff physician was “slicing the geographic market much too thin” in limiting the market to one hospital
• finding that “from the perspective of consumers of medical services [i.e., patients], there is no distinct demand for and thus no market for pathological services”
• considering various antitrust claims: “the very nature of antitrust litiga- tion encourages summary disposition of such cases when per- missible”
• considering various antitrust claims: “the very nature of antitrust litiga- tion encourages summary disposition of such cases when per- missible”
• considering various antitrust claims: “the very nature of antitrust litiga- tion encourages summary disposition of such cases when per- missible”
• considering various antitrust claims: “the very nature of antitrust litiga- tion encourages summary disposition of such cases when per- missible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).