James G. Law v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court has the authority to recognize a promotion by awarding back pay
• holding that the court has the authority to recognize a promotion by awarding back pay
• stating that the courts are “without authority to grant [ ] promotion[s]”
• “Law is not asking the Claims Court to order his promotion but to recognize that it had occurred.”
• “Law is not asking the Claims Court to order his promotion but to recognize that it had occurred.”
• POMS does not bind either the District Court or the 12 ALJ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).