James Freeman v. Chicago Title & Trust Co., a Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that Section 2(c) does not apply to the “sale of intangibles such as insurance”
• rejecting the argument that the transfer of a tangible physi- cal document is a transaction involving goods
• title insurance and title searches are services
• title insurance and title searches are services

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).