James FOWLER, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining an “ALJ’s reliance on . . . his own beliefs as to what the medical evidence should show do[es] not constitute substantial evidence” to support a conclusion that a claimant is not disabled
• “In determining whether the Secretary’s decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, the court must take into consideration the weight of the evidence in the record both for and against the conclusion reached.”
• “In determining whether the Secretary’s decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, the court must take into consideration the weight of the evidence in the record both for and against the conclusion reached.”
• “In determining whether the Secretary’s decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, the court must take into consideration the weight of the evidence in the record both for and against the conclusion reached.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).