· 10/28/1986
James Fernhoff v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, and Does I-Xx
Citations
- 803 F.2d 979
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32924
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When a party has an adequate opportunity to provide the trial court with evidence and a memorandum of law, there is no prejudice [in refusing to grant oral argument].”
- “When a party has an adequate opportunity to provide the trial court with evidence and a memorandum of law, there is no prejudice [in refusing to grant oral argument] . . . .”
- “When a party has an adequate opportunity to provide the trial court with evidence and a memorandum of law, there is no 20 prejudice [in refusing to grant oral argument] . . . .”
- “When a party has an adequate opportunity to 19 provide the trial court with evidence and a memorandum of law, there is no prejudice [in refusing to grant oral argument] . . . .”
- “When a party has an adequate opportunity to provide the trial court with 18 evidence and a memorandum of law, there is no prejudice [in refusing to grant oral argument] . . . .”
- “When a party has an adequate opportunity to 19 provide the trial court with evidence and a memorandum of law, there is no prejudice [in refusing to grant oral argument] . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schroeder, Reinhardt, Beezer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.