James Ex Rel. James v. Burlington Northern, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party, having unsuccessfully moved for a directed verdict, was “not required, in order to preserve error, to also object to the instructions”
• dismissing a plaintiff’s loss of consortium claim, although not explicitly, after finding the defendant was not liable on the underlying claims
• dismissing plaintiffs loss of consortium claim against defendant after defendant held not liable
• dismissing plaintiffs loss of consortium claim against defendant after defendant held not liable
• failure to object to instructions is not an abandonment of position taken on pretrial rulings that form the basis for instructions
• failure to object to instructions is not an abandonment of position taken on pretrial rulings that form the basis for instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).