James Ernest Wallace Sr. v. Letitia Ann Wallace

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that employer substantially controlled employee’s commute because, among other things, employer required employee to use his personal vehicle instead of other forms of commutation (i.e., bus, train, or car pooling)
• finding that employer substantially controlled employee's commute because, among other things, employer required employee to use his personal vehicle instead of other forms of commutation ( i.e., bus, train, or car pooling)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).