James Edward Phillips v. Jasper County Jail Cabalero Eby Garza Kelly Forsythe Riley Moback Sanchez Sewell Lietz Lyman Carr John Freitas Marney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that improperly medicating an inmate and placing him in a dangerous situation can be deliberately indifferent
• holding that mere disagreement with treatment decisions does not rise to level of a constitutional violation
• holding that mere disagreement with a treatment decision is not enough
• holding summary judgment not appropriate where plaintiff presented evidence he was not given anti-seizure medication as prescribed both before and after suffering a seizure
• holding mere disagreement with treatment decisions does not rise to the level of a constitutional violation
• holding evidence an inmate was not given the prescribed amount of anti-seizure medicine was enough to create a genuine issue of material fact on the issue of whether jail employees were deliberately indifferent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).