Skip to main content
· 12/17/2014

James Earl Piland v. State

Citations

  • 453 S.W.3d 473
  • 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 13437
  • 2014 WL 7174357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A confession of error by the State is not conclusive when reviewing an appeal, and, in the absence of reversible error, we are not to make our ruling based on the State’s request to reverse.”
  • the likelihood -14- of a different result must be substantial
  • the likelihood of a different result must be substantial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter, Morriss, Moseley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.