James Earl Harris v. State of Arkansas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that jurisdic- tional statutes “must be interpreted in light of the overall ju- risdictional concept intended by the Congress, and not through the selective narrow reading of individual sentences within the” statute
• distinguishing between this Court’s “review” of cases under Article 67(a), UCMJ, and the limitation on its power to “act” under Article 67(c), UCMJ
• “[T]his Court’s review is limited to questions of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).