Skip to main content
· 4/9/1992

James E. Williams v. Nancy Anderson and S.D. Parwatikar

Citations

  • 959 F.2d 1411
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6466
  • 1992 WL 70012

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • capable-of-repetition finding was “fact-intensive” and not well-developed on the record and therefore “best left to the district court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Ripple, Fairchild

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.