James E. Swann v. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, Etc., and H. D. Taylor, Added And

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming issuance of injunction under Anti-Injunction Act because \issues being litigated in the state court proceeding could not be separated from the issues and relief involved in the federal court suit\
• affirming issuance of injunction under Anti-Injunction Act because “issues being litigated in the state court proceeding could not be separated from the issues and relief involved in the federal court suit”
• affirming district court’s order enjoining state case seeking to bar federally ordered integration of schools
• declining to enjoin state court proceeding when subject of litigation touched upon but exceeded questions already decided by the federal court
• express exception to Anti-Injunction Act which allowed federal court to use its All Writs Act powers to enj oin state court proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).