Skip to main content
· 10/4/1972

James E. Redus v. Harold R. Swenson

Citations

  • 468 F.2d 606
  • 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although the Constitution guarantees the right to competent counsel, we cannot expect counsel to be omniscient or clairvoyant.”
  • “Although the Constitution guarantees the right to competent counsel, we cannot expect counsel to be omniscient or clairvoyant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bright, Stephenson, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.