James E. McMillian v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Tjhis standard of review is more than a rubber stamp for the Secretary’s decision.”
• while Commissioner has burden of proving there is some other type of substantial gainful employment that claimant can perform, Commissioner need not find specific job opening for claimant
• “[T]he cursory observation made by two examining physicians that [the appellant’s] mental and verbal functions ‘were not visibly abnormal’ does not detract from [the appellant’s] complaint of difficulty in concentration.”
• “[T]he cursory observation made by two examining physicians that [the appellant’s] mental and verbal functions ‘were not visibly abnormal’ does not detract from [the appellant’s] complaint of difficulty in concentration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).