Skip to main content
· 3/20/1975

James E. McCall v. C. L. Swain, Superintendent, Lorton Reformatory

Citations

  • 510 F.2d 167
  • 166 U.S. App. D.C. 214
  • 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • saying that section 16-1909 “specifies that the District habeas provisions are not to be construed to restrict the general federal ha-beas provisions”
  • saying that section 16-1909 \specifies that the District habeas provisions are not to be construed to restrict the general federal habeas provisions\
  • holding habeas corpus jurisdiction exists in the district court
  • district court jurisdiction and interpretation of 16 D.C.Code § 1901 (1973)
  • district court jurisdiction and interpretation of 16 D.C.Code § 1901 (1973)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Moore, Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.