Skip to main content
· 1/30/1933

James E. Colliflower & Co. v. McCallum-Sauber Co.

Citations

  • 63 F.2d 366
  • 61 App. D.C. 390
  • 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 3433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, after this court had reversed and remanded on the merits, circuit court could only act in conformity with the opinion because “all the questions had been finally heard, tried and decided on the appeal in this court”
  • stating, “the court below has no power to do any thing but carry out the specific directions [of the mandate]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.