James E. Coakley v. Alfred I. Murphy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that inmates have no protected property interest in continuing in work- release program
• holding that inmates have no protected property interest in continuing in work- release program
• holding that inmates have no protected property interest in continuing in work- release program
• holding that inmates have no protected property interest in continuing in work- release program
• holding that inmates have no protected property interest in continuing in work-release program
• stating that when an equal protection claim does not adversely impact a protected class or a fundamental right, “all that is constitutionally required of the [state action] is that it be rationally related to a legitimate state objective”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).