Skip to main content
· 1/31/1995

James E. Bryant v. James H. Gomez, Director, Department of Corrections, Charles D. Marshall, Warden

Citations

  • 46 F.3d 948
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 1433
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 769
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1756
  • 1995 WL 34272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (\RFRA\
  • stating that religious exercise must be one that “the faith mandates” or “a tenet or belief that is central to religious doctrine”
  • holding that under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (\RFRA\
  • holding that under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Choy, Skopil, Ferguson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.