Skip to main content
· 2/4/1987

James D. Adams v. United States

Citations

  • 810 F.2d 1142
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 17

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that section 5349 “endows Treasury with so much discretion that there is no specific wage or pay provision mandated by statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rich, Davis, Archer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.