James Cuthrell v. Michael J. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Finding that a failure to perform PRTF analysis was not harmless error when the ALJ had specifically found that mental impairment in question was a severe impairment.
• failure to complete PRT may be harmless where there is no credible evidence of severe mental impairment
• “This court has found harmless error [from the failure to complete the PRT] where there is no credible evidence of a severe impairment”
• “The listing for cerebral trauma has one line: ‘Evaluate under the provisions of 11.02, 11.03, 11.04, and 12.02, as applicable.’”
• “[C]erebral trauma, or traumatic brain injury, can be either neurological (11.02, 11.03, 11.04), mental (12.02), or both.”
• “[S]tep two determines whether the claimant has a ‘severe’ medically determinable impairment (or combination of impairments).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).