· 12/2/2013
James Courtney v. Jeffrey Goltz
Citations
- 736 F.3d 1152
- 2014 A.M.C. 495
- 2013 WL 6224341
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 23943
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the district court should have retained jurisdiction over the case pending resolution of the state law issues, rather than dismissing the case without prejudice”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hawkins, Thomas, Nguyen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.