Skip to main content
· 12/2/2013

James Courtney v. Jeffrey Goltz

Citations

  • 736 F.3d 1152
  • 2014 A.M.C. 495
  • 2013 WL 6224341
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 23943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the district court should have retained jurisdiction over the case pending resolution of the state law issues, rather than dismissing the case without prejudice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawkins, Thomas, Nguyen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.