James Cornelious Scott v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “‘comprising . . . a group of first, second, and third blades’” did not exclude razors with more than three blades
• finding that the applicant’s own statements made before the European Patent office support the court’s holding
• holding party to “blatant admission” in argument made to EPO
• holding party to “blatant admission” in argument made to EPO
• considering the patentee’s arguments before the Europe- an Patent Office (EPO) and concluding that a “blatant admission by this same defendant before the EPO clearly support[ed]” the court’s construction
• finding “blatant admission by 18 this same defendant before the [European Patent Office] clearly support[ed]” its claim 19 construction holding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).