Skip to main content
· 2/7/2003

James Clark v. The City of Braidwood

Citations

  • 318 F.3d 764
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2150
  • 2003 WL 257277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a complaint’s failure to overcome affirmative defenses does not warrant dismissal
  • holding that if the plaintiff could prove that a reasonable person would not have discovered the injury ear- lier, he would have a defense to the timeliness defense raised by the defendant
  • holding that if the plaintiff could prove that a reasonable person would not have discovered the injury ear- lier, he would have a defense to the timeliness defense raised by the defendant
  • holding that if the plaintiff could prove that a reasonable person would not have discovered the injury ear- lier, he would have a defense to the timeliness defense raised by the defendant
  • holding that if the plaintiff could prove that a reasonable person would not have discovered the injury ear- lier, he would have a defense to the timeliness defense raised by the defendant
  • reversing dismissal because complaint provided for the “possibility” that the statute of limitations defense could be defeated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Posner, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.